Kelly Ayotte to Debate Tonight with Primary Challenger Jim Rubens on WMUR

Kelly Ayotte will debate challenger Jim Rubens tonight, September 7, at 7PM in a debate hosted by WMUR-TV 9. The debate will also be streamed live on and broadcast on WTPL 107.7FM The Pulse. Ayotte, the incumbent, is seeking her second term in the US Senate representing New Hampshire. She was previously the Attorney General. Jim Rubens is a businessman from Lebanon and previously served in the state Senate. Ayotte and Rubens are seeking the Republican nomination on September 13th. Very few polls have been taken of the GOP primary race, with pollsters’ main focus being the potential match up between Ayotte and Governor Maggie Hassan, who is running unopposed for the Democrat nomination for US Senate. The average of polls from May 25 to August 28 gives Hassan a 0.8% advantage over Ayotte.

Police Department Assists in Filling Sink Hole on Mountain Road

Last week a local bicyclist notice a sink hole on Mountain Road (otherwise known as Route 171, a state road), very close to Canaan Road. There happened to be a Tuftonboro Police cruiser passing by at the moment and the bicyclist waved the officer over. Within a very short amount of time that same afternoon the sink hole was being patched while Chief Andy Shagoury and Officer Tom LaFavre directed traffic.


Here it is after being patched, looking in the opposite direction of the previous photo:

sink hole route 171 mountain road at canaan road

According to a resident who spoke to Officer LaFavre afterward, the visible hole in the roadway was just the tip of the iceberg, and there was a much larger hole underneath that could have caused the road to cave in.

The good news is that the hole was filled in immediately and also that the state had already informed the selectmen that all of Route 171 will be repaved this summer, from the Ossipee line to the Moultonborough line.

Thank you to the Tuftonboro PD for their prompt attention to this matter!

The Tyranny of the Majority

In 1787, James Madison, writing as Publius in Federalist No. 10, warned against majority rule in pure democracy: “Such democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths.”

It is just this type of tyranny of the majority that lends support to demagogues such as Bernie Sanders. When Sanders says that it is “immoral” for the “top 1 percent” to have as much wealth as the “bottom 90 percent combined,” what is he advocating? For that matter, what did Hillary Clinton mean (other than that she was trying to lean as far to the left as possible) when she tweeted, “The top 25 hedge fund managers make more than all of the kindergarten teachers in America combined. That’s not acceptable.” What is she proposing that the teachers (the majority) do to the top 25 hedge-fund managers (the minority)? Donald Trump, who decided to call himself a Republican about five minutes ago, is no less a demagogue than the other two when he appeals to the silent “majority” who have been taken “advantage of.” All three are suggesting that the “majority” punish the “minority.”

Madison, like so many of the Founding Fathers, worried deeply about the dangers of pure democracy. Federalist No. 10 is devoted to mitigating the tyrannical effects of majority rule; Madison wishes to achieve this through factions (parties or other interest groups that arise naturally due to human nature). “The inference to which we are brought is, that the causes of faction cannot be removed, and that relief is only to be sought in the means of controlling its effects.” The Constitution, drafted largely by Madison, creates a divided government in which power is intended to be balanced. We do not live in a democracy, and so long as we follow the Constitution, we can avoid the dangers inherent in such a form of government.

Maynard Thomson (Letter to the editor of the Granite State News, March 31) is right to ask us, “If 51 percent of the voters want something, are they justified in using government to force the other 49 percent to support that undertaking?”

Thank You, Clay

The letters section of a newspaper is a good place to publicly air one’s grievances. However, today I have another purpose entirely. Today I write to say thank you to Clay Gallagher. Clay is the supervisor of the Tuftonboro Transfer Station & Recycling Center, which is the most well-run transfer station that I have ever seen. It’s almost an oxymoron to say that a transfer station is clean. It is, after all, where we take our trash. But our transfer station in Tuftonboro is clean, well run, organized, and efficient. That means Clay is very good at his job. And his men are also good at their jobs. They’re also pleasant fellows, by the way.

I’m a new resident in town. I moved here last November. The first time I went to the transfer station, Clay gave me a tour. He explained that while recycling is not mandatory in Tuftonboro, there’s a big difference between the trash compactor and the recycling bins. It costs us money to ship the compacted trash to the landfill in Rochester. On the other hand, we sell the recyclable material. Clay told me that Tuftonboro has higher rates of recycling than other towns where recycling is enforced by ordinance.

Last Sunday when I made my weekly run to the transfer station, I was chatting with Clay and he mentioned that the station, while it is not entirely self-sufficient, brings in about $50,000 more per year than it did when he took over several years ago. That’s $50,000 that we as taxpayers don’t have to spend. Or rather, that we can spend on something else. Like repaving the roads. Or we could even reinvest it back into the transfer station. Either way, Clay’s doing a great job, both for the transfer station and the town in general.

Thank you, Clay.

This appeared as a letter to the editor of the Granite State News.