In a request for proposal to study the feasibility of building a new police facility, the selectmen seek to more than double the size of the police force and almost double the department’s vehicle fleet. The selectmen are looking to possibly increase the department from four full-time officers to six and from no part-time officers to four and from four police vehicles to seven.
The Union Leader reports:
TUFTONBORO — Conservation officers assisted a hiker to safety after she fell on a trail in wintry conditions, the New Hampshire Fish and Game Department said Sunday.
Patricia Tarpey of Gilford, her husband and their dogs were hiking with some friends near Mount Shaw when she fell and injured her right shoulder around 1:20 p.m. Saturday, Fish and Game said in a release.
Trail conditions were a mix of snow and ice when Tarpey fell and members of the hiking party called for assistance, according to the release.
Conservation officers helped Tarpey make her way back down the slick trail for about two miles until she reached her car around 5:45 p.m., Fish and Game said.
Temperatures were in the mid-30s Saturday with snow and sleet. Fish and Game said Tarpey and the other hikers were equipped for the conditions with warm-weather and climbing gear.
Board of Selectmen
- ✅ Lloyd Wood: 295
- Robert “Bob” McWhirter: 248
- ✅ Thomas J. Young: 289
- ✅ Helen Hartshorn: 278
- Chris Sawyer: 233
- Barry Ennis: 196
- ✅ Daniel F. Barnard: 498
Trustee of the Trust Funds
- ✅ Dave M. Braun: 466
- Write-in Votes: 4
- ✅ Susan H. Weeks: 412
- Write-in Votes: 17
- ✅ Gordon Hunt: 461
- Skip Hurt (Write-In): 28
- Total Write-ins: 41
- Fictitious Characters: 2
- Undervotes: 59
Supervisor of the Checklist
- ✅ William “Bill” Rollins: 495
- Write-in Votes: 8
- Undervotes: 60
- ✅Yes: 410
- No: 133
These numbers are accurate to the best of my knowledge.
Update 8:07 PM: The total number of zoning ordinance ballots is 562, while the number of town officer ballots is 563. The difference is due to an absentee voter who returned only the town officer ballot.
Update 7:10 PM: With the polls closed, the preliminary count is 563 ballots (including 71 absentee ballots and excluding two spoiled ballots).
Election volunteers divide ballots into piles of 50. Then the ballots are checked and if any discrepancies are discovered, the pile is rechecked.
A spoiled ballot is defined in statute:
659:22 Spoiled Ballots. – If any voter spoils a ballot, he may receive others, one at a time, not exceeding 3 in all, upon returning each spoiled one. The ballots thus returned shall be immediately marked “cancelled” by the moderator over his signature and, at the close of the polls, shall be preserved as provided in RSA 659:95.
Source. 1979, 436:1, eff. July 1, 1979.
Tuftonboro residents have been arriving at the Town House all day to vote in the town election. Only two of the races are contested, the selectman’s seat –between incumbent Lloyd Wood and challenger Bob McWhirter — and two budget committee positions — a four-way contest between incumbent Helen Hartshorn, Barry Ennis, Chris Sawyer, and Tom Young.
At 2PM this afternoon about 450 ballots had been cast in person, according to Heather Cubeddu, the town clerk. In addition, 70 absentee ballots had been received by yesterday’s 5PM deadline. That means the turnout this year is already larger than it was last year.
Last year 373 total votes were cast in the selectman’s race, which was held during what was called winter storm stella. Many residents in town lost electric power and some roads, such as Sodom Road, were closed due to downed trees and power lines.
Gordon Hunt, library trustees’ chairman, informed the selectmen this morning that the trustees had met yesterday and voted unanimously that the library-addition warrant article should be tabled at Town Meeting.
The library trustees met this morning at 8AM for a “work session.” I had not seen the meeting posted over the weekend so I did not go.
What did the trustees decide to do about the library article debacle, which surely was the topic of their meeting? I hope they will let us know soon. I will update this post with new information, if I get it.
If you know anything, please leave a comment.
Update from Mark Howard, in a comment below:
Max, I heard about the meeting but did not attend. According to an email I received from Christie Sarles…
“The Trustees voted unanimously this morning to table the addition/renovation project for this Town Meeting.”
Christie, for anyone who doesn’t know, is the librarian. Mark is the chairman of the Zoning Board of Adjustment, and involved in various other ways in town, such as the conservation commission and the Tuftonboro Association.
Update from Paul Matlock, library trustee:
The selectmen are saying they will call a special Town Meeting in April to “ratify” the vote on the library addition at Town Meeting. This would not be a legal option. The relevant language below is clear.
Please read the following statute:
31:5-b Legalization of Meetings. –
I. In the past, irregularities and procedural defects in actions of municipal legislative bodies have been cured by actions of the general court. The procedure in this section is an alternative approach which enables municipalities to effect legalization by local action.
II. Whenever the legislative body of a municipality has voted by the requisite majority, by written ballot or in any other manner legally authorized, to take any legal actions and the vote is subsequently discovered to be procedurally defective, such defects may be cured and legalized by a vote at a special meeting called for the purpose of ratifying the procedurally defective action. Procedurally defective actions shall mean minor procedural irregularities such as failure to comply with statutory requirements regarding time or place of notice, vote, hearing, or wording, or with any procedural act not contrary to the spirit or intent of the law. The ratification of the procedurally defective action shall be subject to the following requirements:
(a) The municipality may, on the authority of the governing body, call a special town meeting for the exclusive purpose of curing such defect.
(b) The special town meeting called for that purpose may not take place less than 21 calendar days after the original vote.
(c) Not less than 7 calendar days prior to the special town meeting, not counting the day of the special town meeting, the governing body shall conduct a public hearing at which the reasons for the special town meeting shall be explained.
(d) The municipality shall comply with all statutory notice and procedural requirements for holding special town meetings.
(e) The necessary majority required to cure the defects shall be the same as the majority as required for passage of the original article.
III. When any procedural defect has been cured under this section, actions of the voters shall be valid as if all statutorily required proceedings had been complied with.
Obviously, the “defect” in the library-addition article — the selectmen failed to hold a public hearing — has been discovered not subsequently but prior to the vote. So, that’s that. The selectmen cannot use 31:5-b to “ratify” the defective vote that they know now, before Town Meeting, to be defective.
But for the sake of argument, let’s pretend that the “defect” had been discovered after the vote. It is not a “minor procedural irregularity” to not have a public hearing. A minor procedural irregularity would be to post the notice 6 days before the hearing instead of 7, for instance.
Any way you look at it, the selectmen have failed the library crowd. The library-addition article, with the roughly $1 million loan, is not happening this year, because of the selectmen’s failure to hold a public hearing on the loan.
I would hope that the library crowd remembers this significant mistake when voting on Tuesday for the position of selectman.
Skip Hurt, who was going to vote for the library addition, has said that he will be voting for Bob McWhirter even though Skip and Bob disagree about the library addition. Skip wrote on the Tuftonboro Free Speech Forum, “I’m not afraid to have someone with an opposing view from mine if they are competent. In fact I think the town will be better off.”
At this morning’s library open house, I proposed a compromise on the library. I hope that the library crowd will see the merits of compromise.
Continue reading “A Compromise on the Library?”